Comparison of Control in Heavy Rain

3

April 16, 2013 by samjo14

Comparison of Control in Heavy Rain

Heavy Rain is a game about motion. It allows the player to simulate the realistic movements of four fictional characters, movements as trivial as leaning on a wall or as monumental as firing a gun. These take place through the precise, time-sensitive input of game the controller. Originally, the game was designed to receive input via the standard PlayStation Sixaxis or Dualshock 3 controllers. However, in September 2010, less than a year after the release of Heavy Rain, a new kind of controller entered the Sony marked: The PlayStation Move. This changed the way Heavy Rain was playe. Now, making your character lean on the wall was more than just a flick of the thumbs. It may have required a full thrusting motion of the entire arm. Resultant changes in player immersion were both positive and negative. Motion control technology was at that time, and even still now, a blessing and a curse.

I played Heavy Rain once almost a year ago, using a Dualshock 3 controller. Coming back to it last Monday I expected to just dominate the game with my foreknowledge. But the PlayStation Move prevented that. With an unfamiliar control scheme, it was like playing a completely new game. Despite knowing the events as they happened, I was frustrated to not have all the power to stop them.

How precisely different was the experience of PlayStation Move in comparison to Dualshock 3? Well, with Dualshock 3, many of the character actions that involved some directionality within the world of the game, such as steering a car or dodging a punch, made use of the control stick to act them out. But some of the more static or general actions, which varied from using a lighter to answering a ringing telephone, used instead the eight pressure sensitive buttons. The problem with this is these buttons never seemed to match to the action of the moment. Why does one have to press triangle to deliver a kick, but square to throw a basketball? Why in a later scene, does R2 have to be pressed to deliver a kick with the same foot? In contrast to other games with standardized controls, Heavy Rain has a ludonarrrative dissonance between the action on screen and the pressing of the button. While buttons of basic shapes do not really convey meaningful action in any game, by standardizing the controls, I as a player, am at least able to create a cognitive association between what I’m doing and what the character is doing. For example in most Mario games, the A button is always jump, and I can utilize that that for the optimization of my reflexes.

With the PlayStation Move, I am better able to previsualize the action required before I am prompted to do so onscreen. Drinking orange juice requires me to hold the motion controller vertically and move it upward. Tossing a bill on a table requires a rotating action of the wrist. The Sixaxis and Dualshock 3 controllers do have some similar uses for their own motion-sensing capabilities, but not to the extend that the Move controller does. Those controllers are limited by the requirement of holding with two hands and their insensitivity (relative to the Move) to orientation.

The PlayStation Move controller does however have its own drawbacks as well. The biggest flaw is that many actions often require the full range of your arms motion. A player must then always hold the controller in front of them awkwardly, anticipating the next required movement to be in any direction. After less than five minutes of gameplay, flailing instinctively in a full orbital range of motion, my arm had quite the workout. Admittedly, I lack upper-body strength, but that’s a ridiculous requirement to play videogames, which were once stereotyped as being antithetical to physical activity. The throbbing arm pain made me want to put down the motion controller and go play Mario, which points to another problem. If the gaming session is too exhaustive, players will have to drastically reduce their play time. Playing a full chapter, hence from one save point to another, becomes more of a chore than a recreation. The motion controller detracts from the cinematic quality that Heavy Rain offers through both its immersion and its capacity for long playing sessions. Moreover, the Move controller doesn’t fully fix the issue of trivial button presses. When Ethan’s wife makes him carry the groceries, each bag he takes is a different button, one including the Move exclusive trigger button. If you ask me, nothing about carrying groceries says, “squeeze the trigger.”

Understandably, motion capability in Heavy Rain was always meant to be flawed. It was a new technology for both PlayStation developers and players. Even those coming to the scene with Wii experience were surprised. Playstation Move has many differences from the Wii, which has more trivial directionality, and the Xbox Kinect, which requires full use of the players body. While it has great potential in player immersion, it does not fully fix the problem of triviality, and its just way too exhausting.  Videogames were not always perfect translations between real action and fictional action, but with such a long history of using controllers, the Dualshock 3 in some ways just feels more natural then using all the arm muscles I was born with. The push among programmers for motion control technology is going to take some getting used to.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Comparison of Control in Heavy Rain

  1. trosen3 says:

    It was interesting to read your article after the discussion of motion control in class yesterday. I agree that the playstation move better allows you to interpret the necessary movements prior to being given instructions which gives a completely different gameplay experience then that of a controller. I think the points you made about the negativity of using motion controls fits a lot of the reasons we discussed yesterday of why motion control will likely never dominate gameplay. Personally, I feel people are attracted to video games partially because it gives them a more immersive entertainment method then watching television while still providing a leisurely activity. Being a “couch potato” and taking that time to relax is an important aspect of gaming. Rarely is a players goal to get physical activity out of a game so the majority of games will remain controller based until another method arises that allows players to still have long gaming sessions as you mentioned.

  2. namaram says:

    I agree with both the fact that the move allows great realistic control but also but can also become a burden in these types of games. The actions with the move make so
    much sense, but for a game it gets really tedious. I think another problem is the degree of calibration you need for these types of games. For example, for movements where I needed to push into the screen I actually needed to get up and do a full reach in while others I feel didn’t need to. I can only imagine in actual action scenes what it would be like flailing my arms around just trying to escape. I feel you on the coach potato sentiment of games. We aim to use games as video games as semi passive enjoyment but not for fully active motion. We’ve talked about how we use games to get away from reality but games like these straddle that line too closely. Were it not for the emphasis on story, this game would probably have been a huge flop especially if it was released with the move as the main controller. Games like these kind of show that motion control may simply be the next great addon and nothing else.

  3. nrbontha says:

    I agree completely – Heavy Rain is not meant to be played with a Move controller. It slows down the story considerably because it’s hard to move around and perform the tasks with the Move controller. Since the game is mostly storytelling and little to no action, the controller only detracts from the game. However, I do think that the game would be better on the XBOX Kinect because then you could use the controller to move around and then perform the tasks (like opening a door, brushing your teeth, etc.) with your hand, which is much easier and more natural.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: